The Ups and Downs of Text Links

I have just signed up for a new service (currently in beta testing) called Text Link Warehouse. The concept is simple. You paste some code at the bottom of your web pages, Text Link Warehouse sells text links to other publishers, and you and TLW split the revenue.

The appeal:

To publishers, the appeal is simple. Anything that will add a source of monetization to your site without causing you a whole lot of headaches and work is a good deal.

To advertisers, the appeal is having lots of text links pointing to your new site, speeding up indexing (hopefully) and boosting traffic.

BUT…

There’s the Google PageRank issue.

Lots of people are under the impression that a high Google PR is a super great thing to strive for. I personally haven’t seen PR correspond to revenue or traffic, but the fact is that people will pay for high PR links. They won’t pay, at least not much, for low PR text links.

So, one question that needs to be addressed by TLW is whether advertisers will be able to buy only high PR links, or whether they just buy impressions… and the related issue of whether publishers will get extra revenue from their high PR pages or they’ll just get a flat rate per impression.

This, actually, is a vital issue, since if it’s not handled well, and publishers can get more from selling their own text links on their high PR pages, then they’ll only list their low PR pages on TLW, which will make the service less attractive to advertisers, which will lead to fewer buys, and less income all around.

The second issue that needs to be addressed is how much control publishers will have over the ads displayed.

Google has made clear that it will be penalizing sites that link to ‘low rent’ areas of the web, which means that it could seriously hurt your site to link to online pharmacies, casinos, and many of the other types of sites that would be common advertisers for TLW.

Also of concern is the issue of the service leaving a fingerprint… since Google frowns upon buying and selling text links.

SO

While I’m interested in how this will work out, and may add many of my higher traffic and high PR links in the future, right now I’m only going to play with TLW on this blog.

Stay tuned if you want more unbiased, common sense reaction once the links start showing up.




You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

5 Responses to “The Ups and Downs of Text Links”

  1. sears card Says:

    Very easily, the particular post will be the most effective topic with this similar matter. We fit in with the data and may thirstily count on your current impending revisions. Just stating cheers will not only be sufficient, with the tremendous lucidity within your producing. I am going to immediately get your rss feed to keep current with any messages.

  2. Travel Offers Says:

    Hi I like this post and it is so informational and I am definetly going to bookmark it. One thing to say the Superb analysis this article has is trully remarkable.No one goes that extra mile these days? Well Done! Just another tip you shouldinstall a Translator for your Worldwide Audience :)

  3. Download xtube Videos Says:

    Excellent blog! I truly love how it’s easy on my eyes as well as the details are well written. I am wondering how I may be notified whenever a new post has been made. I have subscribed to your rss feed which need to do the trick! Have a nice day!

  4. Darcie Gunlock Says:

    Has anyone tried this guy on fiver he is offering 2000 quality keyword backlinks for $5? http://www.fiverr.com/users/pneumy/gigs/submit-your-site-for-2000-backlinks-keyword-targeted-and-drive-traffic-to-your-page

    He has some good reviews but I dont know anything about fiver or this ad.

    Let me know is you know

  5. Elmer Gionest Says:

    That was an intriguing review. I have started a site called fiverr recently and found it to be the finest site to get a steady small/med income stream using intriguing ideas for beginners. Well worth checking out!

Leave a Reply