<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Interesting blog results</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.surfthemind.com/index.php/2007/02/23/interesting-blog-results/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.surfthemind.com/index.php/2007/02/23/interesting-blog-results/</link>
	<description>where money and happiness co-exist</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 May 2012 00:29:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Business Education</title>
		<link>http://www.surfthemind.com/index.php/2007/02/23/interesting-blog-results/comment-page-1/#comment-8068</link>
		<dc:creator>Business Education</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2007 14:00:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.surfthemind.com/index.php/2007/02/23/interesting-blog-results/#comment-8068</guid>
		<description>I also agree with Allan. There are a lot of reason. sandbox is one of the reason.  Remember also google crawling speed.
Have you try to wait until 3 months and see what happen?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also agree with Allan. There are a lot of reason. sandbox is one of the reason.  Remember also google crawling speed.<br />
Have you try to wait until 3 months and see what happen?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wendy</title>
		<link>http://www.surfthemind.com/index.php/2007/02/23/interesting-blog-results/comment-page-1/#comment-5467</link>
		<dc:creator>wendy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Feb 2007 20:10:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.surfthemind.com/index.php/2007/02/23/interesting-blog-results/#comment-5467</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re right, Allan. I wouldn&#039;t draw any definite conclusions from it, but it strikes me as a logical move for the search engines to make to counter the MFA explosion. I&#039;m definitely going to try and replicate the results with future sites to confirm, but not so often that I subject 50% of my new sites to the MFA sandbox. :)

Wendy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re right, Allan. I wouldn&#8217;t draw any definite conclusions from it, but it strikes me as a logical move for the search engines to make to counter the MFA explosion. I&#8217;m definitely going to try and replicate the results with future sites to confirm, but not so often that I subject 50% of my new sites to the MFA sandbox. <img src='http://www.surfthemind.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Wendy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allan</title>
		<link>http://www.surfthemind.com/index.php/2007/02/23/interesting-blog-results/comment-page-1/#comment-5462</link>
		<dc:creator>Allan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Feb 2007 13:57:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.surfthemind.com/index.php/2007/02/23/interesting-blog-results/#comment-5462</guid>
		<description>Interesting. Could be a number of reasons not just because of Adsense. Saying that if G was putting instant Adsense sites in the snadbox it wouldn&#039;t be a surprise with the number of MFA sites about these days.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting. Could be a number of reasons not just because of Adsense. Saying that if G was putting instant Adsense sites in the snadbox it wouldn&#8217;t be a surprise with the number of MFA sites about these days.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

